|
The ability to synthesize
RNA in the laboratory is critical to many techniques. Radiolabeled
and nonisotopically labeled RNA probes, generated in small
scale transcription reactions, can be used in blot hybridizations
and nuclease protection assays. Such probes are much more
sensitive than random-primed DNA probes. Small scale reactions
may also be used to synthesize RNA transcripts containing
modified nucleotides for various biochemical and molecular
biology studies. Large scale transcription reactions, generating
up to 200 µg of RNA per reaction can be used for aRNA
amplification, expression studies (microinjection, infection
with viral transcripts, in vitro translation), structural
analysis (protein-RNA binding), and mechanistic studies
(ribozyme analyses). In this article, we present an overview
of transcription, including requirements of in vitro transcription
reactions and a comparison of conventional vs. large scale
RNA synthesis.
Requirements For Transcription
In vitro transcription requires a purified
linear DNA template containing a promoter, ribonucleotide
triphosphates, a buffer system that includes DTT and magnesium
ions, and an appropriate phage RNA polymerase. The exact
conditions used in the transcription reaction depend on
the amount of RNA needed for a specific application.
RNA Phage Polymerases
The common RNA polymerases used in in
vitro transcription reactions are SP6,
T7 and T3 polymerases, named for the bacteriophages
from which they were cloned. The genes for these proteins
have been overexpressed in E. coli and the polymerases
have been rigorously purified. RNA polymerases are DNA
template-dependent with distinct and very specific promoter
sequence requirements. The promoter consensus sequences
for each of the phage RNA polymerases are shown in Figure
1.
|
|
Figure 1. Consensus
Promoter Sequences. The
+1 base is the first base incorporated into RNA during
transcription. The underline indicates the minimum
sequence required for efficient transcription. |
A DNA vector containing all three phage
promoters in tandem was used in Figure 2 to demonstrate
the specificity of each polymerase for its own promoter
(e.g. lack of "crosstalk"). After the RNA polymerase binds
to its double-stranded DNA promoter, the polymerase separates
the two DNA strands and uses the 3' - 5' strand as template
for the synthesis of a complementary 5' - 3' RNA strand.
Depending on the orientation of cDNA sequence relative
to the promoter, the template may be designed to produce
sense strand or antisense strand RNA (see "Does
It Make Antisense?").
|
|
Figure 2. MAXIscript RNA
Polymerases Recognize Only Their Intended Promoter
Sequence. All transcripts were produced
using the appropriate MAXIscript
Kit.
Equal volumes were electrophoresed on 6% denaturing
acrylamide, then the gel was dried and exposed
to Kodak AR film for 4 hrs with an intensifying
screen. Lane 1 contains Ambion RNA
Century Markers. Note: Markers were synthesized
66 days prior to the experiment.
|
Although SP6 polymerase is often perceived
to be less efficient than T7 or T3 polymerases, under optimal
reaction conditions we find that all three RNA polymerases
synthesize RNA with roughly equal efficiency; this is shown
in Figure 2. Differences in transcription can often be
explained by differential sensitivity to salt. SP6 polymerase
is the most sensitive to salt contamination often carried
over with the DNA template.
Template Options: Plasmids, PCR Products,
Oligonuclotides and cDNA
The DNA template must contain a
double-stranded promoter region where the phage polymerase
binds and initiates RNA synthesis. Transcription templates
include plasmid constructs engineered by cloning, cDNA
templates generated by first- and second-strand synthesis
from an RNA precursor (e.g., aRNA amplification), and
linear templates generated by PCR or by annealing chemically
synthesized oligonucleotides.
Plasmids
Many common plasmid cloning vectors include phage polymerase promoters. They
often contain two distinct promoters, one on each side of the multiple
cloning site, allowing transcription of either strand of an inserted sequence.
Such dual opposable promoter vectors include Ambion's pDP,
Promega's pGEM, Stratagene's pBluescript and Invitrogen's pCRII vectors.
Ambion's pTRIPLEscript family
of vectors contain all three phage polymerase promoters
in tandem (on the same side of the multiple cloning site),
allowing any of the three polymerases, SP6, T7 or T3
to be used.
Plasmid vectors used as transcription
templates should be linearized by restriction enzyme
digestion. Because transcription proceeds to the end
of the DNA template, linearization ensures that RNA transcripts
of a defined length and sequence are generated. The restriction
site need not be unique, and providing the promoter remains
adjacent to the transcription template, the vector itself
may be digested multiple times. It is also unnecessary
to purify the promoter-insert sequence away from other
fragments prior to transcription because only the fragment
containing promoter sequence will serve as template.
Restriction enzyme digestion should be followed by purification
since contaminants in the digestion reaction may inhibit
transcription.
PCR Products
PCR products can also function as templates for transcription. A promoter can
be added to the PCR product by including the promoter sequence at the 5'
end of either the forward or reverse PCR primer. These bases become double-stranded
promoter sequence during the PCR reaction.
Oligonucleotides
Two oligonucleotides can also be used to create short transcription templates.
Two complementary oligonucleotides containing a phage promoter sequence
are simply annealed to make a double-stranded DNA template. Only part of
the DNA template the -17 to +1 bases of the RNA polymerase promoter needs
to be double-stranded. It may be more economical, therefore, to synthesize
one short and one long oligonucleotide, generating an asymmetric hybrid
(see "Minimal Sequence
Requirements").
cDNA
A more recent use of in vitro
transcription is in aRNA amplification reactions. For
these reactions, transcription templates are generated
from RNA by using an oligo(dT)-T7
promoter primer during reverse transcription. The
cDNA is converted to a double-stranded transcription
template by a second-strand synthesis reaction.
Sense or Antisense?
When designing a transcription template, it must be
decided whether sense or antisense transcripts are needed. If the RNA is to
be used as a probe for hybridization to messenger RNA (e.g. Northern blots,
in situ hybridizations, and nuclease protection assays), complementary antisense
transcripts are required. In contrast, sense strand transcripts are used when
performing expression, structural or functional studies or when constructing
a standard curve for RNA quantitation using an artificial sense strand RNA.
The +1 G of the RNA polymerase
promoter sequence in the DNA template is the first base
incorporated into the transcription product. To make
sense RNA, the 5' end of the coding strand must be adjacent
to or just downstream of, the +1 G of the promoter. For
antisense RNA to be transcribed the 5' end of the noncoding
strand must be adjacent to the +1 G. If the insert is
in a vector, the vector should be linearized downstream
from the promoter and the inserted sequence to be transcribed
(see "Does It
Make Antisense?").
Conventional Or Large Scale Synthesis?
In vitro transcription reactions
can be divided into two types: conventional and large
scale. Conventional reactions are typically used for
synthesizing radiolabeled RNA probes or for incorporating
modified nucleotides into transcripts. Large scale reactions,
which generate >100 µg RNA per reaction, are
useful for structural and expression studies, as well
as for aRNA amplification.
Conventional Reactions: Synthesis
of Labeled RNA Probes or Modified Transcripts
Conventional reaction conditions, such as those
used in Ambion's MAXIscript Kit,
use relatively low nucleotide concentrations (0.5 mM each). Higher
nucleotide concentrations are not necessary since, in these reactions,
the low concentration of radiolabeled or modified nucleotide present
effectively limits the total yield of the reaction.
The total concentration of the
limiting nucleotide (labeled/modified and unlabeled)
should be at least 3 µM for efficient synthesis
of full length RNA transcripts of <400 nt (more will
be needed to synthesize longer transcripts).
A 3 µM concentration of radiolabeled
rNTP can be obtained by adding 5 µl of a 800 Ci/mmol,
10 mCi/ml (or 12.5 µM) solution of [α-32P]
NTP. Higher specific activity labeled rNTPs are available,
but are provided at a much lower stock molar concentration
(e.g. the 3000 Ci/mmol, 10 mCi/ml has a stock concentration
of only 3.3 µM). Without the addition of unlabeled
NTP, it is impossible to achieve the final minimum 3 µM
reaction concentration.
Because limiting nucleotide concentration
can result in premature termination of transcription,
there is a trade-off between synthesis of high specific
activity (or extensively modified) transcripts and full
length transcripts. Diluting the limiting radiolabeled
or modified nucleotide with unlabeled nucleotide proportionally
lowers the specific activity (or extent of modification)
of the transcript, but yields more full length transcript.
To make very high specific activity or extensively modified
transcripts one should limit or omit any unlabeled limiting
nucleotide present.
When transcribing RNA from templates
lacking CTP and TTP in the 12 bases immediately downstream
from the transcription start site, the 3 µM limiting
nucleotide minimum can be overcome (1). Ambion's CU
Minus Promoter Technology provides vectors containing
CTP and TTP-minus RNA polymerase promoters as well as
conversion primers that can be used to eliminate CTP
and TTP bases from RNA polymerase promoters in existing
vectors. Such templates produce a high proportion of
full length transcripts in reactions containing as little
as 0.165 µM total limiting nucleotide. Using CU
Minus technology, the highest specific activity radiolabeled
nucleotides available can now be made by in vitro transcription
without addition of unlabeled nucleotide. As a result,
RNA probes with 7.5X higher specific activity can be
transcribed.
Large Scale Synthesis: For Structural
and Expression Studies, and aRNA Amplification
Large scale in vitro transcription reactions
can produce up to 120-180 µg RNA per microgram template in a 20 µl
reaction. Novel, patented technology developed by Ambion (i.e., MEGAscript,
see below) allows the phage RNA polymerases to remain active at high
nucleotide concentrations that would ordinarily inhibit the enzyme.
Yields from these large scale reactions are typically 10 to 50 times
higher than those possible with conventional transcription reactions
(without any limiting nucleotide). Reaction conditions (e.g. the type
of nucleotide salt, type and concentration of salt in the transcription
buffer, enzyme concentration and pH) are all optimized not only for
each polymerase but for the entire set of components. Only under these
conditions can you achieve optimal yields.
Products for In Vitro Transcription
Ambion offers a complete line of
products for in vitro transcription. The MAXIscript Kit is ideal for making radio- and nonisotopically
labeled RNA probes for use in hybridizations. The probes
generated by the Strip-EZ RNA Probe Synthesis and Removal
Kits are readily stripped from Northern blots, enabling
many rounds of hybridization without damaging nucleic
acid bound to the blot.
The MEGAscript
family of kits use Ambion's high yield patented
technology to synthesize RNA for applications where
large mass amounts are required. Large amounts of capped
RNA transcripts can be synthesized with the mMESSAGE
mMACHINE Kit using the same high yield patented
technology. If desired, the Poly(A)
Tailing Kit can be used to add a poly(A) tail to
capped RNA transcripts synthesized with the mMESSAGE
mMACHINE Kit.
The MessageAmp aRNA
Kit is a complete kit for aRNA amplification based
on the patented Eberwine method. Incorporating MEGAscript
high yield transcription technology, this kit includes
all necessary reagents for first-strand cDNA synthesis,
RNase H digestion, second-strand synthesis, cDNA purification,
in vitro transcription and aRNA purification.
Reference
1. Ling M-L, Risman SS, Klement JF,
McGraw N, McAllister WT. Abortive initiation by bacteriophage
T3 and T7 polymerases under conditions of limiting substrate. Nucl.
Acids Res. (1989) 17: 1605-1618.
|